Show HN: gtlds.fyi – All the proposed new gTLDs

Suggestion: Allow the user to sort the list by number of applications.

so many TLDs that seem to be exploiting similarity to existing ones?

.cmo/.con are particularly egregious

Just found that "Charleston Road Registry Inc." is the legal name for Google's registry...

Does anyone know if subdomains on these gTLDs are required to be offered/sold publicly once acquired?

I don't understand how some of them can be granted to just one company when they are a "global" namespace, and then not allowed by the public to purchase or use.

I'm not talking about ones that are the name of a well known huge company that is unlikely to disappear.

Very nice! Some more sorting and filtering options would be handy, and some more view options, so each TLD doesn't take up half the screen when it has a lot of applicants.

PS - Your Source link is a 404.

plenty are stupid or probably malicious but i'm happy for anything that will maybe convince people to stop making programs that check for a "valid" tld (they always have stale lists). i use an unusual ccTLD and i get told plenty that i've entered an invalid email

> .lan

Don't you dare, Coffee Danger LLC

Very useful! I found this article a really good summary of the gtld situation:

https://www.wired.com/story/icann-top-level-domains-meow/

I have been looking for an expansion of TLDs that are short, have a decent ring for self-hosting stuff, and don't sound too scammy.

Like `.link` is pretty cool but it's expensive because one of those personal-link-inbio companies created it and wants to cash in on it.

Just from scanning these, maybe:

* .air

* .bit

* .hub

* .iam

* .index (long but I love how universal it is)

* .lab

* .log

* .pod

* .port

* .self is really interesting, wonder if that would take off

* .sys

* .zen

I'm exhausted by all of the new gTLDs at this point, opening them up to specific companies and organizations basically violated the entire purpose of a gTLD in the first place.

i'd like to see this (filter / exclude) the dotBrand or brand-specific TLDs, as they are not open to the general public.

like .playstation or .airbnb or .nike

Finally .scam might be something for all us scammer, I'm tired of getting mixed up with a bunch of honest-looking people.

None of this seem to have any rhyme or reason. What's the reason for these to exists, besides to raise funds for whorever is selling these?

How many of these are companies that learnt from the 1990s and made sure they registered their own name/tradmarks etc rather than having to buy them off scalpers, even though they might have no plans to use them?

Every possible word can become a TLD :)

Am I the only one who's not a fan of these new, longer TLDs? IMO TLDs should be two or three characters. I'm not sure why I feel this way, but there's something unwieldy about a TLD like .cooking.

Why are these TLDs so tightly bound to a specific organization? Why can't their registration be more open? Keeping them so locked down makes them useless. Or am I misunderstanding something?

I don't want to see any new domains, we rely on the domain as a source of security -- I know, it sucks, but it's all we have, to look at that browser address bar and confirm it is really mybank.com that is asking for your login details, and each time someone adds a TLD, you have the risk of mybank.us, or mybank.info or mybank.bank confusing users. Enough already with the TLD.

The auctioning off of the GTLD space for private gain is one of the most egregious and offensive public-private wealth transfer grafts of our century.

ICANN announcement about what this is: https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-reveals...