↑
logo

Any nerds out there who've read a lot of research papers?

Posted by shriy-singh |3 hours ago |8 comments

JonChesterfield an hour ago[1 more]

I'm well into the thousands of research papers read. Understood a fair fraction of them. Couldn't tell you what the abstract was for any. The memorable parts are the ideas and the results within the paper.

Some titles stick. "Attention is all you need". "SSA is functional programming". Plus more people see the title than read the abstract. Only one I got to name myself was "Shared Memory Remote Procedure Calls" which I now realise is in exactly the same theme of given the title, you don't need the abstract or the contents.

Rotundo 2 hours ago[1 more]

Most memorable to me: https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1966-72-06/S0002-9904-1966...

Short, succinct and no AI in sight.

dekhn 2 hours ago[1 more]

https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf

"Abstract The Paxos algorithm, when presented in plain English, is very simple."

mac3n an hour ago[1 more]

see https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-968X.12...

include a SUMMARIUM in Latin and ΣΥΝΟΨΙΣ in Greek, for that real Scholar effect.

ksudb 2 hours ago

Comment deleted