xrd 31 minutes ago
Manaus is in the middle of the Amazon.
Needless to say, a bit scary to hear that, but we landed without issue.
They told us we had two choices: the nice hotel with a shared room, or the lesser nice hotel with no roommate. I chose the latter. When we go there, they said, "oops, sorry, short on rooms!" So I had a roommate.
Wandered around Manaus, took a skiff out on the Rio Negro. Saw pink river dolphins. A little boat approached us and a kid handed me a sloth, and then demanded I return it with a twenty dollar bill.
The airline got us another plane 24 hours later. Made it back to the US safely.
A few weeks later, the airline reached out and said "Here is $100 for your trouble."
I declined to take that offer. I had missed several business meetings that cost me actual money. I couldn't donate blood for years because I had been to the Amazon and was tagged a malaria risk.
During the many arguments with the airline I threatened to take them to small claims court.
I got a really strange response over email which I clearly wasn't supposed to see. A representative from that airline was asking internally if they could put me on the no-fly list. That was really chilling.
But, this is the kind of information I'm worried about when a vendor sells my data. If Google wanted to sell a product to the airlines that offered to keep annoying people like me from purchasing flights, they could do that with that email chain. I'm skeptical it'll be wiped correctly. Isn't my poor writing style basically my signature? How do you wipe that?
js2 42 minutes ago
> There’s also operational data in the trove, describing over 763,000 flights, five million crew pairings, more than 1.2 million fuel slips, and records describing purchases of 787,452 parts.
> Google has reportedly said it bought the data to improve its AI services.
Gives "this call is being recorded for training purposes" new meaning.
ronbenton 33 minutes ago
I really doubt all this stuff was “de-identified”
blitzar an hour ago
pm215 16 minutes ago
(The PDF mentions "the standard for deidentification set forth under the California Consumer Privacy Act", which suggests this is all pretty well legislatively understood.)
Ekaros 32 minutes ago
KORraN an hour ago
sethammons 35 minutes ago
Taikhoom10 23 minutes ago
dec0dedab0de 19 minutes ago
steveBK123 an hour ago
cmiles8 26 minutes ago
an hour ago
Comment deletedeveryone an hour ago
Razengan 12 minutes ago
No I don't want to just use your enshittified service for free. Fucking pay me and watch me all you want :)
evek 11 minutes ago
Martha Wells hit it nicely in The Murderbot Diaries.
radres an hour ago
398642258909 34 minutes ago