logo

Mistral OCR 4.1

Posted by spelk |an hour ago |11 comments

ianhawes a few seconds ago

I won't comment on accuracy, but in internal benchmarks, Mistral OCR is significantly faster than comparable APIs.

ComputerPerson 16 minutes ago[2 more]

I've got a scan from a book that I OCR with new releases. Ligatures, critical sigla, Fraktur letterforms, subscripts, superscripts, etc.

Nothing special about this model for overly-detailed work like mine.

It's been a while since I last tested (and discontinued my subscription), but the "pro" models from OpenAI dominate. Not surprising, given the price difference, but it would be nice if an OCR-specific model could perform better. It's worth mentioning that even the highest-end models do a pretty poor job with intricate text like mine.

king_crimson 19 minutes ago[2 more]

At this point I lost all hope for Europe playing any significant role in the AI race. If that’s a good or a bad thing I don’t know, but it seems to me like that’s the reality.

merb 17 minutes ago

1000 Pages / 3.5€ this is expensive as hell. If this is not fastly superior than something like tesseract it is not worth it.

mainecoder 19 minutes ago[1 more]

The chinese did it better, mistral is alive thanks to regulations.