logo

SpaceXAI's Grok 4.6 Scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Posted by wertyk |an hour ago |59 comments

small_model a few seconds ago

SpaceXAI is the only frontier model company that had its own compute/date centres and soon chip making factory, I think they will pull ahead with cheaper tokens similar intelligence and better harness/tools. Grok build is 2-5x faster than Claude Code in my opinion.

satvikpendem an hour ago[4 more]

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

nylonstrung an hour ago[16 more]

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

sidcool 35 minutes ago[1 more]

Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.

pzo an hour ago

Seems the cache read pricing almost doubled from $0.30 in Grok 4.5 to $0.50 in Grok 4.6.

In my experience in heavy coding sessions most pricing is just cache read and cache write like 80% of my token bill.

petesergeant 32 minutes ago

Interesting. Grok 4.5 is a capable model, although not quite at Fable/Sol levels. Will be interesting to see how this holds up. Musk appears to have made a savvy choice buying Cursor's data.

thiago_fm an hour ago[2 more]

I often wonder if there's a chance, even if minimal... that they stole the weights of the Anthropic models they run on their datacenter... or are actively destillating it.

TSiege 12 minutes ago[1 more]

I’m perpetually surprised people feel comfortable sending their code to an LLM that was made to call itself MechaHitler. I wouldn’t touch grok or now cursor with a 10 foot pole