skinfaxi 6 hours ago
Bender 5 hours ago
No, AI companies should be treated like any other company. If their product is causing damages or loss of life it should be handled just like any other company that has a malfunctioning product that is causing damages or loss of life. If one day androids using AI go rogue the military can get things under control and the company can be taken offline until root causes are determined and resolved. Repeat offenders can be annexed under eminent domain, liquidated and victims paid out. Businesses must be permitted to fail. No special treatment for inept leaders of AI companies and no excuses. If the argument is that something has been created that is too complicated to understand then take it away from them until they are not only qualified but also act like responsible grown-ups.
whycombinetor 6 hours ago
This is sloppy. Criminal negligence exists (although some crimes do require intent). And civil tort certainly doesn't require intent.
FeteCommuniste 6 hours ago
Blame the prompter or person who assigned the task to the AI. It's their responsibility to use the tool in a safe way, just like it's a gun owner's duty not to fire their weapon carelessly into the air.
childofhedgehog 6 hours ago
arjie 6 hours ago
specproc 6 hours ago
xiphias2 5 hours ago
neves 5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Comment deletedaetherspawn 6 hours ago
measurablefunc 6 hours ago
Sui_Kate 5 hours ago
ihsw 6 hours ago
Comment deleted