user- 41 minutes ago
I see some negative comments here that I could understand why funding scares them when it comes to their open source tool but like.. atleast congratulate the guy.
ValentineC 2 hours ago
I'm curious what the actual problems with AGPL were.
asadm an hour ago
humblepie 2 hours ago
hx8 an hour ago
If you're worried about enshittification I wouldn't be. It's relatively basic open source software that runs locally. A perfect candidate for a fork if the base app starts degrading.
kar1181 an hour ago
dominotw 2 hours ago
nlh 2 hours ago
I have such mixed feelings about this - YC means VC means commercialization means enshitification. I really wish that weren't the case, but it so very often is.
Here's hoping this one's different...
(PS I am a big YC fan in general! I don't mean to sound anti-YC or anti-VC or anti-capitalism. But when it comes to low-level essential development tools, I'll never forget what happened to Warp, which started out as such a nice clean terminal project and turned into an absolute money-chasing mess.)
tyleo an hour ago
VC funding can enshitify things but it can also improve them. Here’s hoping for the latter.
EGreg 2 hours ago
Would something like this qualify:
barapa an hour ago
rvz 2 hours ago
So this is another reason why developers do not pay for their tools and instead the developers of these tools go to VCs anyway. It's not the fault of the author, but most of the users (developers themselves) always want their tools for free at $0.
You have to pay and support the tools you use or else the VCs will do it for you so you can't complain when scenarios like this keep happening.