rbanffy 2 hours ago
NT also offered the same UI as Windows 3 (Windows 3 and 3.1 were OK, but Windows for Workgroups was the first really nice 16-bit Windows).
One issue with OS/2’s Windows compatibility is that Microsoft had to license Windows from Microsoft, so an OS/2 that could run Windows programs was more expensive than a “pure” one. Even though Windows NT is profoundly different from 16-bit Windows, it kept the same APIs, so. OS/2 exposed the differences to the apps running in user mode.
WarOnPrivacy 2 hours ago
That said, I recently got a USB mouse working in a NT 4.0 box (it was controlling a gas chromatograph or some such thing).