logo

Did They Ghost You?

Posted by mooreds |4 hours ago |91 comments

arcade79 2 hours ago[8 more]

Anecdotal, I know, but I was ghosted by Google back in 2004-2005 or thereabouts. Back and forth with a recruiter, who promised me that she would book phone screens. Then heard nothing. Pinged her repeatedly. Nothing.

A few years later got another Google recruiter after me. Ended up getting hired in 2008.

Looked up the previous recruiter. Her last day at the company was the day she promised she would book phone screens, or the day after (can't remember exactly, this is quite a few years ago). I can only assume she was suddenly let go.

Ever since, I keep wondering how many ghostings happen because the person holding the strings disappears for some reason, and there's a lack of system to follow up on that.

chrismarlow9 4 minutes ago

Ghosted by Apple here. Devops or SRE job for services teams if I'm remembering right. Did a months worth of rounds. Was told the offer letter would be coming within the next week. Turned down other companies on the gamble that it was actually coming. Never came. Pinged recruiter and finally after a month was told they stopped hiring and would reach back out in a few months when it started back. Never happened. That was 3 years ago. It was character building to say the least.

syntaxing 44 minutes ago

I had a Meta recruiter talking to me a while back (maybe 5 years) and she ghosted me. Found her obituary online a couple weeks later. Recently, had another Meta recruiter ghost me but that’s because of the Meta layoff round robin. Probably for the better since FRL has more or less been gutted due to AI focus.

JumpCrisscross 33 minutes ago

This should include the hiring manager, recruiter or other point of contact. Particularly at large companies. That aligns individual incentives with the goal of reducing this behavior.

jasonjmcghee 3 hours ago[1 more]

Based on the strange emoji use in place of some buttons, I'm guessing this is vibe coded- and a lot of this is really nice looking front end - great color, topography, border styles... Would be interested to know how much intervention there was or if this is where we are

kilroy123 42 minutes ago

Sadly, not a new phenomenon. It does seem to have gotten a lot worse.

One time, way back in ~2012, I did an all-day onsite interview with several people, lunch with the team, and everything. A full 8-hour gauntlet, and they ghosted me after it.

ChrisMarshallNY 2 hours ago

Those are quite small sample sizes. I assume that this is supposed to grow?

In my experience, I was usually ghosted (sometimes, rather brutally). In a couple of instances, I was able to get the companies to confirm that I was toast, but only after I bugged them.

42 minutes ago

Comment deleted

orphereus 3 hours ago[2 more]

My anegdotal experience in EU is that ghosting AFTER the company responds to your application is very, very rare.

I would always get the usual "Unfortunately, we have decided..." charades. At least no ghosting.

I can think of only one situation, and it was kinda peculiar in its own right (they called me 8 months after my application because they were in a jam and I said I won't be able to start in such a short notice they wanted, and they warned me in advance they would ghost me because the HR was I presume in a crunch).

As for the ghostings BEFORE they even respond to the job application, I'd say that it is around 40% of job applications that I never get a response after "We have received your job application yada yada yada".

Again, this is just my anegdotal experience. Maybe my experience in EU job market is a rarity.

firefoxd an hour ago

During the pandemic, my Amazon recruiter became sort of a friend. We communicated maybe over a period of a month, I joined multiple Amazon online panels and got to meet some employees. Everything was going well until it stopped abruptly.

Covid was going full force, so I assumed something happened to her, especially since she was older. Emails and text went unanswered. I was worried... Until I checked LinkedIn and saw that she was posting daily.

Full story: https://idiallo.com/blog/dont-ghost-me

ethagnawl 29 minutes ago

I've been meaning to write something up about this myself but, suffice it to say, I've been asking myself this question a lot lately.

nexus2045 an hour ago

I very much advocate for this, but only if you're past the HR/recruiter screen. Onsites, coding screen, second round, etc.

Animats 42 minutes ago

"1 of 1 would interview with them again" is too small a sample. This site needs more data before they post recommendations.

lschueller an hour ago

An API for reporting would be nice. Besides that: hope this page came to stay. It's nicely done. Couple of years ago there was a very similar project here on hn, which came to a halt after only a couple of days it got posted

pbgcp2026 26 minutes ago[1 more]

Cease and desist letters from lawyers piling in 3 .. 2 ... 1 ... They should've done it in a form of .onion service.

SystemOut 2 hours ago

I think that there should be a feature of "they turned me down/declined" and have an option for whether or not they gave you useful feedback.

We should also reward and encourage positive behavior by companies.

dasil003 36 minutes ago

As a hiring manager I take candidate experience seriously because I know it’s easy to get wrong and leave people with a really bad taste in their mouth at a sensitive time.

As a candidate, though, I have learned not to take offense to being ghosted or the million other indignities that one is subjected to in a modern interview pipeline. It’s just a part of the modern economy, and far from the worst one. As terrible as it is, it’s not a hill worth dying on, suck it up and just move on with your search.

sscaryterry 2 hours ago[1 more]

In my personal experience, order of dodginess :)

1. Recruiter 2. Second-hand car salesman 3. Realtor 4. Mechanics 5. Lawyers

lacunary 2 hours ago

this is cool but the leaderboard is just going to converge on large companies unless it's normalized somehow

bogwog an hour ago

This would probably be more effective (and controversial) if the reports included the linkedin profiles of the recruiters/employees involved in the ghosting.

I can imagine a lot of situations where it'd be unfair, so maybe giving them an opportunity to explain their side before it goes up might be important... but also fuck you if you ghost someone trying to find a job.

2 hours ago

Comment deleted

rubylimetea 2 hours ago[4 more]

Is ghosting really such a big deal?

Wait until you get an overly smug rejection letter that the author seemed too eager to write, and took too much joy in writing.

Some people love to reject, and would never miss an opportunity.

Another angle is -

If you've been ghosted, you still have not been told no. That means there's no record of you ever getting denied for the position.

(and maybe you really haven't been)

It's kinda better IMO

thousand_nights 3 hours ago

for a moment i thought this was a commentary about my relationships

lulzury 2 hours ago

I think companies that don’t even acknowledge your application also need to be in this list. Most companies ghost at the application level.

zem 2 hours ago

wonder if this would count as sousveillance [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance]

tamimio 2 hours ago

> Provide a factual account without names,

What that even means? What’s a “factual account”?! The story/events? The account you used to apply? Or what

That being said, ghosting and generic rejections are alike, usually when you don’t hear from a company within a week (or within the time you ask them when you would hear back), you know they went with someone else, going back at you after that time is a major redflag, either they are chaotic, or the other candidate ditched them in the negotiations because they don’t know how to negotiate and are looking for bargain not a skillsets.

Also, I think instead of the company only, the recruiter/HR name should be there plus the company, public shaming is needed for those individuals, maybe other recruiters are good on following up, which is not fair for the good ones while the bad ones are hidden.

nekusar 3 hours ago[2 more]

The real answer is that many jobbads are fraudulent.

And fraudulent job ads should be handled the same way a fraudulent advertisement for a good is handled: you either make good and prove hiring, or you're tried for felony fraud.

fHr 28 minutes ago

Nice name and shame

jagged-chisel 3 hours ago[1 more]

“Yes”

strathmeyer 2 hours ago

Comment deleted

mathisfun123 2 hours ago

this is pointless because different teams/different recruiters within the same company operate differently (surprise surprise humans are different).

SilverElfin 2 hours ago[1 more]

We need this for employees too. There are many who don’t act ethically when interviewing for a job.

enos_feedler 29 minutes ago

Good god get over it. Only a tech worker would make a whole site dedicated to an issue that bruised their ego