An Elite NYC Public School Admitted 777 Students. Only 3 Were Black

> About 80 percent of the seats went to Asian and white students.

It seems very strange to lump these two demographics together. Presumably Asians make up a smaller chunk of the school-age population than whites. By reporting them in the aggregate, we don't know if they're both represented/over-represented at the same rate, or whether (as I suspect is true) white students are somewhat overrepresented and Asian students are greatly over-represented.

But revealing this would undermine the narrative that admissions are somehow racist, and benefit white (and to a lesser extent white-adjacent) students. In reality, the students with the highest academic performance are Asian, which would not be the case if the system were designed to benefit white students.

    The sole criterion for admission is a 114-question, three-hour exam known as...

1. [Screw NYT for disabling text selection, and I had to type this in] Edit: probably that was my bad.

2. This sounds like a very important sentence, and begs at least 2 questions: "is the selection really racist as implied by the title", and the other one is "why is the result like that"? IMO the answer to the first question (based on the article at least) is no. I have no answer for the second.

This is really all that needs to be said about this.

>Yiatin Chu, a public school parent and the co-founder of Parent Leaders for Accelerated Curriculum and Education, a group that has supported gifted and talented programs, said that the entrance exam was a “race-blind, income-blind test.”

Ms. Chu attended Bronx Science and her daughter will be a sophomore next school year at Stuyvesant. She said the exam was a fair measurement that should remain.

“These schools are rigorous and demanding, and students who go to these schools should be well-prepared to take that on,” Ms. Chu said. “Why are we minimizing the effort that is put in for something that is important to them?”