bignavy an hour ago
3/10 article, 10/10 headline
hyperpape an hour ago
The law seems...truthy, though I find it a little too underspecified to assess.
The conclusion is true, and I'll even overlook it being a slight strawman. Your "long genius"[0] CEO cannot talk to AI and get a full business overnight. That's true.
But how does that follow from the "law"? The article admits that you can shift complexity to a complex algorithm or information processing system that the consumer doesn't touch.
You know what's a incredibly complex information processing system? GenAI.
So we have a reasonable conclusion, an ok "law", and no real connection between them. It was an inane non-sequitur.
[0] Not actually a genius.
simonw an hour ago
an hour ago
Comment deletedsmallmancontrov an hour ago
> "I love Tesler" -Donald Trump
Tesler II: when Elon does it, it is not illegal.
exabrial an hour ago
I mean yes, the headline... Uber broke the Taxi Medallion law, and gets around hiring employees and other tax law for example. These are stupid regulations though and everyone knows it, so nobody cares.
throwaw12 an hour ago
* Want to change laws? create lobby group
* Want to get special treatment? buy politicians
* Want to get even bigger? No problems, can do anything for your money, lets pick any candidate for POTUS and we can make it a reality
* Some people are creating problems? (Thomas Massie) - no problems, lets promote another candidate and spend +$30M on his campaign
Citizens? Oh come on, who cares about them, call riot police and they will start behaving properly
clear-octopus an hour ago
Comment deleted