logo

Swiss voters reject proposal to cap population at ten million

Posted by FabCH |3 hours ago |134 comments

brightbeige an hour ago[4 more]

Recent, related New Yorker article that goes into the background leading up to the vote

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/06/15/could-switzerl...

    Despite the prosperity, many Swiss had mixed emotions about the guest workers, who came largely from Southern Europe. As the Swiss novelist Max Frisch observed, “We wanted workers, but we got people.”

hintymad 2 minutes ago

Just curious, how can a state cap the country's population? This appears that they assume their birth rate will low and they will need to absorb immigrates?

abc03 2 hours ago[5 more]

Maybe a personal analysis: It's a trend that is growing all over Europe. It's the equivalent of overtourism and a problem for the ruling parties (except the SVP that proposed it). Expect it to continue quite soon in Switzerland and other European countries (France, Germany etc.). Of course it doesn't make sense to curb immigration at 10 Mio and many know it. It was also for many a vote against the ruling parties. Although Switzerland is an immigration country, Swiss don't think this way. It's more farmer/alpine style: Welcome guests but expect them to leave again. Many Swiss also don't interact with foreigners a lot, including myself (besides at work). Many of my friends don't want to give up their prosperity. They are fairly advanced in their career and it's more about enjoying life. So for many of them it's more a rational decision than really a belief we should have more immigration. As long as I can benefit, it's good. For younger people it may be different. My wife, who is not native Swiss, was in favor. And compared to other countries, I think Xenophobia is low.

mfuzzey 7 minutes ago

Interesting that those supporting the motion claimed it was because there was no space left for new arrivals and that it put too much pressure on infrastructure like trains and yet the largest support came from the countryside which proably has less overcrowding and the cities were greatly against it.

Makes me think that "overcrowding" wasn't thre real reason...

FabCH 3 hours ago[1 more]

In case people were wondering about the result of that thread which made the front page a few days ago…

fsh an hour ago

The SVP campaign in favor of the initiative was something else. Half the country is plastered with their posters, and social media is full of astroturfing. It didn't pay off this times, but the propaganda dominance of this party is concerning.

ourmandave an hour ago[1 more]

Never heard of a hard limit on population. What happens if you go over?

It was terrible for girls born in China when they had their one child limit.

poisonborz an hour ago

Misleading to call this "cap population", no one can cap population. The vote was about capping immigrant benefits, mostly aiming germans (reaching 9.5m) and then Swiss EU isolation/"Swexit" (at 10m). Basically the right wing SVP's long term goals packaged in a format that was more palatable to the masses.

phendrenad2 an hour ago[3 more]

I don't get why they would want to do this, when runaway depopulation is the biggest issue facing the world. We're at a point where (I think, controversially) we need to sanction (or more) nations that aren't increasing their population annually. This is an existential threat facing the human race.

alephnerd 2 hours ago[4 more]

> Swiss citizens have rejected by a 55% majority...

This is still very close for comfort, and SVP will re-propose it again and again and again as it and it's predecessors have done for decades.

hdb385 an hour ago

Comment deleted

anonym29 2 hours ago[4 more]

[flagged]

jeffbee 2 hours ago

Cities once again save rural voters from civic suicide.

gregorygoc an hour ago[2 more]

It’s not tech related, and should not be part of this site.