logo

GLM 5.2 Is Out

Posted by aloknnikhil |3 hours ago |56 comments

Reubend an hour ago

Seems like there's no official blog post with benchmark results yet. But I'm once again thankful for the Chinese AI labs for being open with their work and contributing it to the world under permissive licenses like this. The Fable 5 fiasco is just another reminder of how valuable these things are to have.

khalic a minute ago

Given the US government’s latest stunt with Fable, this is looking more and more like the future.

Can’t rely on strategic products if they’re gated by capricious actors.

Open weight models are basically immune to that

radious 2 hours ago[5 more]

The real news here is that Digg is still up :O

easygenes 34 minutes ago

This release was rushed to hang on the coattails of the Mythos drama (“hey, sorry you can’t use Fable, but try us while you wait this weekend!”) I think they planned to release next week, hence benchmarks not all being ready yet.

satvikpendem 2 hours ago[1 more]

Released at the exact same time, 5:21 pm (Chinese time), as when Anthropic received the letter from the government banning Fable, and explicitly citing other models becoming unusable.

throwaw12 an hour ago

I wish they would write a blog post about capabilities of this new model, what to expect from this model, is it cheaper, is it faster or does it have better quality in the outputs.

But still, thank you for the release

ortekk 2 hours ago[11 more]

With deluge of Chinese models popping up recently, I believe there's a few issues one needs to evaluate before deciding to use these models:

- Ethics. As known, ou American frontier AI companies are incredibly ethical. And I have yet to see any interviews or blog posts by Chinese companies where they talk about how they are ethical, or at least credible HN comments about it.

- Safety. Do they covertly sabotage or at least refuse to answer questions that could help cyber- and bioterrorists in their nefarious purposes? What about ML-related questions that could help terrorists create AI models without guardrails?

- Child safety. This is especially important with "free for all" open-weight models, most of which are Chinese (ever think about why that's the case?). How are we going to do age verification and KYC with models that anyone can just download on their computer?

- Intellectual property theft. How can we be sure that no output of our American frontier AI models was used while training these Chinese models?

Frankly, there's a plethora of other issues I don't have time to get into right now. Personally, I believe distribution of Chinese models in the US should be paused until they are required to submit models to the government for review and evaluation, to make sure they are made to Anthropic/OpenAI standards.

We need legal grounds for that.

Write to your congressman, congresswoman or congressperson and urge them to stop proliferation of dangerous non-American intelligence. This is a matter of national security and needs to be acted upon as soon as possible, preferably before IPO.

ls612 3 hours ago[5 more]

Is it a coincidence that both MiniMax and Z.ai are releasing frontier open weights models right as the USG is trying to impose a cap on model capability offered to the public?

holoduke 4 minutes ago

It would be so extremely awesome if this ai would have been a Claude killer alternative and 90% of Europe cancels Claude subscriptions and subscribe on this one. It would be the dumbest move of the year by the US.

bflesch an hour ago[2 more]

Weird, z.ai does not resolve for me. Is there anything special about that domain?

https://z.ai

bugbubug 3 hours ago

Comment deleted

ricointhemood 2 hours ago

Comment deleted

3 hours ago

Comment deleted

testfrequency 2 hours ago

Digg

edit: ouch, I’m a current Digg user. Even donated for their relaunch :(