Watermark API – $0.01/image, 10x cheaper than Cloudinary

I don’t get it? Wouldn’t figuring out a simple FFMPEG command to watermark an image (or video) take less time than integrating with an API to do it? Plus if you had to do a lot of images it would be much faster to work locally than having to ship the images remotely somewhere. -someone who does this a lot, specifically for videos.

I built a dead-simple watermarking API because existing solutions (Cloudinary, imgix) are overkill and expensive for developers who just need to slap a logo on images.

- $0.01/image or $19/mo unlimited - 50 free images to test - 5-minute integration - API-first, no dashboard bloat

Built in 7 hours. Looking for feedback from developers who've struggled with this problem.

Try it: https://api-production-caa8.up.railway.app/docs ```

## Additional Context for Discussion

If the post gains traction, be prepared to discuss:

### Technical Details

- Built with Node.js, Express, Sharp for image processing - Uses Cloudflare R2 for storage (S3-compatible, cheaper than S3) - PostgreSQL for tracking usage and credits - Stripe for payments - Deployed on Railway.app

### Why This Exists

- Cloudinary charges $0.10-0.15 per image for watermarking - imgix starts at $199/month for basic features - Many developers just need simple batch watermarking - Existing solutions require complex dashboards and setup

### Performance

- Watermarks 1,000 images in under 2 minutes - Batch processing up to 100 images at once - Returns ZIP files for batch downloads - All processing happens server-side

### Pricing Comparison

- *Our API:* $0.01/image or $19/month for 2,500 images - *Cloudinary:* $0.10-0.15/image (10-15x more expensive) - *imgix:* $199/month minimum (10x more expensive for similar volume)

### Use Cases

- E-commerce sites watermarking product photos - Photographers adding logos to portfolios - Social media managers branding images - Developers building apps that need image watermarking